Design Template by Bikingtoronto

King Street bike lanes could be extended as part of complete street process

Last Tuesday night was a busy one for bike-advocacy projects, and one of the many meetings that I failed to warn anyone about was Alexandria's King Street Complete Street Community Meeting. This meeting dealt specifically with the Complete Streets project along King Street between Radford Street and Janney's Lane.

The purpose of this meeting is to seek community input. The project will be implemented in conjunction with the resurfacing of the roadway

The presentation is here.

South of Janney's Lane there are already bike lanes. 


The draft bicycle network shows this as an "enhanced bicycle corridor" so this is an opportunity that make that a reality. The presentation from the 17th was more general than specific, but they gave considerable space to cycling in the slides.


At this point, the most important part is to get involved while it's still early.

Please submit Comments to
If you would like to be added to the project email list, please email Hillary.

Maryland prosecutors are having trouble with 2011 Criminally Negligent Manslaughter law

In light of the decision to not prosecute in the Holden case, when the driver fell asleep at the wheel, I thought this 2013 article on the use of the 2011 Criminally Negligent Manslaughter law was instructive. 

prosecutors from around the state have had mixed success in winning convictions using the new criminally negligent law, created in 2011 as a middle ground between auto manslaughter and lesser traffic charges punishable with fines.

prosecutors are seeking changes to the new law, which carries a sentence of up to three years in prison and $5,000 fine, because they say even that is difficult to prove.

"It looks great on paper, but it doesn't work out that way," Anne Arundel County State's Attorney Anne Colt Leitess said of the new law.

In the other Anne Arundel case, Edward Cramer of North Beach was found not guilty of criminally negligent manslaughter in the death of jazz musician Joe Byrd

In that case the driver ran a red light

In drafting the criminally negligent manslaughter legislation, lawmakers aimed to create a charge that would punish drivers who cause fatal wrecks but whose actions don't rise to the "gross negligence" standard of auto manslaughter.

Under the new law, prosecutors must prove the driver made a "gross deviation" from how a reasonable person would act in the situation.

Several area prosecutors argue gross deviation is too tough to prove and too similar to the existing auto manslaughter law. They say it would be more appropriate for the charge to require only a "substantial deviation," which more aptly applies to actions that are more egregious than traffic violations.

Prosecutors have tried unsuccessfully to persuade state lawmakers to change the law and plan to try again in next year's General Assembly session.

In Baltimore County, Deputy State's Attorney John Cox said his office has been successful in prosecuting criminally negligent manslaughter cases two out of three times.

In the one case that didn't result in a conviction, Cox said, the driver was allegedly talking on the phone and traveling at 62 mph before smashing into the back of a car stopped on Interstate 83 because of an accident ahead. A 5-year-old boy in the back seat was killed, he said.

A judge found the driver not guilty of criminally negligent manslaughter and fined the driver $1,000 for negligent driving and speeding, Cox said.

"I truly believe I may have had much different chances of success if the law was more clearly set forward," Cox said.

Del. Luiz R.S. Simmons, a Democrat from Montgomery County, spent seven years trying to get the law passed. He said he would consider tweaks — but only if the state's attorneys can prove it's not working.

"I think that it's a fair law," said Simmons, a lawyer whose practice includes criminal defense. "It's an intermediate standard. It was designed to try to bring justice to the grieving families and children who have lost family members because of extreme acts of negligence."

More than 20 people traveled to Annapolis in 2011 to testify to lawmakers about the heartbreaking crashes that killed their loved ones and the drivers who only paid small fines for causing them.

In the emotionally charged hearing, lawmakers heard from a Reisterstown father whose teenage son was killed, the wife of a highway worker killed on the job near Frederick and an Owings Mills woman whose husband was struck and killed while riding his bike in northern Baltimore County.

Federal Bike to Work Act reintroduced

If it is not literally the least that Congress can do to encourage more bike commuting, it's close. 

Reps. Joe Crowley (D-NY), Vice Chair of the Democratic Caucus, and Erik Paulsen (R-MN) announced the reintroduction of The Bike to Work Act (H.R. 4104), bipartisan legislation that would amend the Internal Revenue Code to allow workers to use their pre-tax commuter benefits for bike share programs, just as they already can for other forms of transportation.

Originally introduced in the 113th Congress, the bill will give commuters the option to pair bike share with other forms of transit, greatly expanding mobility and improving access to existing transit systems.

When the bike commuter benefit bill was being voted on, the CBO estimated it would cost $2 million in 2008 and $30 million over 10 years. I wonder if they've figured out how much it is actually costing and how many people are taking advantage of it. 

Anacostia Riverwalk Trail Construction update Nov 2015

About 3 months ago I went out on a tour of the section of the Anacostia Riverwalk Trail currently under construction from Benning Road to the Maryland boundary. Since then work has continued and more sections of the trail are paved.

Starting from the north, jeff sent these photos of the causeway and bridge near the New York Avenue bridge. 


Bridge over a small stream just north of New York Avenue.


Trail causeway

South of this, in the area of Kenilworth Gardens, I heard the trail is paved, but I haven't been out there to confirm that. But on the section between Nash Run and Benning Road there is more pavement.


"Traffic circle" north side of Watts Branch


Traffic diverter on the south side of Watts Branch Bridge (view previously seen in this photo)


Where the trail connects to Anacostia Avenue, it is at road width, which likely means it will be used by cars too. (same area)


Trail as road  (same shot from August)


Where the road dead-ends - the old road continues through the park though


Where the trail connects to the road (same shot from August)


Trail over the hill (same shot from August)


Where the pavement begins, next to the old Pepco plant site (same shot from August)

Anyway, the whole trail is now paved from just north of Benning Road to Anacostia Avenue. There's still some work to be done on that stretch though, and bridges over Nash Run and the outflow stream as well as the causeway to tie it all together. But a fall 2016 opening, as projected on the project page, does seem within reach.

And though not part of this section, here's another piece of the Anacostia Riverwalk Trail under construction. This is the promenade at Florida Rock, right next to the baseball stadium (though for some reason it is all fudged up).


Bike and Roll to offer Christmas tour by bike

More here

Aptly named “Christmas on Wheels,” the tour and rental company announced today.  Christmas on Wheels will be offered every Friday, Saturday and Sunday beginning December 4 through December 20 from 4:00-6:30 pm. 

Tour highlights will include the Botanical Gardens Holiday Showcase; a hot chocolate stop; the exquisite decorations at the Willard Hotel and of course, the Capital and National Christmas Trees.  The cost for the bike tour is $39 for adults and $34 for children 12 and under and $64 per person for the Segway tour. 

Driver who killed cyclist Tim Holden fell asleep behind the wheel

As was reported earlier this month, the driver who killed cyclist Tim Holden in Bethesda will face no criminal charges. What is new from this recent WJLA story is that the crash happened because the driver fell asleep behind the wheel. 

Prosecutors say a dogged two-month investigation found the driver wasn't drunk, high, speeding or texting, but rather fell asleep during an early morning commute from the Baltimore area to a construction site in Bethesda. Not nearly enough negligence to press charges, they say.

"There's definitely a lot of frustration and anger and fear and sadness in the community over the outcome. The goal would be to protect all the other lives that are still out there. This guy has proven that he can't operate a vehicle safely and we would like to see him off the roads," Evans concluded.

And good news, he's paid his fines, so I suppose his license is no longer suspended?

Montgomery County Police issued Freeman three tickets; one was for negligent driving. Last week he admitted his guilt in Montgomery County District Court and paid $690 in fines.

In the only other case in Maryland I know of where a cyclist was killed by a sleeping driver, the driver got six months in a nighttime-only facility; but in that case the driver left the scene and turned herself in later. So it was a more serious crime. More, including the crash report, is here at a very well researched article in Bethesda Magazine.

“This crash specifically really struck a chord with people,” said Greg Billing, executive director of the Washington Area Bicyclist Association. “Here was a person who was doing everything right while riding a bike, at least from the details that we know, and he was killed with very little consequences for the driver. When as a community and a culture are we going to stop accepting traffic deaths?”

I suspect Freeman faces a pretty hefty civil court judgement, and may have trouble getting insurance - and thus driving - in the future. But then maybe not. 

WABA is arguing that the state is setting a high bar for negligence in the recently passed "criminally negligent manslaughter" law.

The criminally negligent manslaughter law says “the defendant should have been aware but failed to perceive that [his] [her] manner of driving created a substantial and unjustifiable risk to human life,” but also that “simple carelessness is insufficient to establish defendant’s guilt.”

"While it is deeply disturbing to all that a man lost his life while cycling in a calm suburban neighborhood, our investigations and analysis based on the law indicate that this accident was just that; albeit a deadly one," Korionoff said Monday.

“Prior to [2011] there wasn’t anything between a traffic ticket and vehicular homicide.  This was put in to be the middle ground,” Billing said, referring to the criminally negligent manslaughter law. “The challenge is many state’s attorneys have interpreted that bar as very high for what is actually negligent.”

“I don’t know all the circumstances of this case, but hitting somebody who’s in the shoulder of the road is rather negligent,” Billing said. “If the legal tools aren’t there, then we need the state’s attorney pushing for the tools that they need to hold drivers accountable. That’s really what it comes down to.”

I feel like the prosecutor was overly cautious here. Falling asleep behind the wheel is pretty negligent. I think being awake is a minimum standard for safe driving. It would be one thing if this kind of case had been prosecuted many times and the courts had rejected the driving-while-sleepy = criminally negligent manslaughter in all such cases. But I don't get the sense that that is the case here. Instead, this is just an accident. Nothing to be done about it. Move along. 

From the archives: When the W&OD Trail was going to connect to the Appalachian Trail

The W&OD railroad used to run from Alexandria to Bluemont, Virginia; but the trail only runs from the Arlington/Alexandria boundary to Purcellville. At one point in the late 80's-early 90's it looked like the trail might extend along the remaining west end of the ROW all the way to Bluemont and the Appalachian Trail. 

When the trail was "completed" in 1988, the park authority stated that they had "plans to extend the W&OD seven miles farther to Bluemont and the Appalachian Trail." The section from Purcellville to Bluemont was admittedly a bit different from the rest of the railroad, as it had been abandoned in 1938, 30 years before the rest of the line was. Nonetheless, in 1988 they stated that

The park authority plans to extend its W&OD Trail to Bluemont and the Appalachian Trail, which follows the border between Loudoun County and Clarke County.

Two years later, the Park Authority stated that they hoped to have the seven mile extension completed in 3 years. 

Park Authority Executive Director Darrell Winslow said money may not be the biggest hurdle in making the plan a reality. Rather, finding land for the skinny extension -- an eight-foot-wide paved path and room on either side for drainage -- could be the toughest challenge, he said.

The Park Authority began trying to complete the W&OD trail by asking the Loudoun government to amend its Rural Land Management Plan to indicate that the extension might be built from Purcellville to the Clarke County line, west of Bluemont.

That request received unanimous approval from the Planning Commission on Oct. 24 and has been forwarded to the county Board of Supervisors. In addition, the Park Authority must submit detailed plans and receive a commission permit -- similar to a permit issued to a public utility -- along with any other permits required by the Loudoun zoning administrator, county officials said.

Park Authority officials first must decide where they want the trail extension to go. The linear park follows the right of way of the defunct Washington & Old Dominion Railway between Shirlington, near Interstate 395, and Purcellville. But the portion of the train line's old path that is west of Purcellville is privately owned and probably unavailable for the trail extension, park officials said.

The agency said it may try to find a new path through the rolling hills or, more likely, it may try to persuade the Virginia Department of Transportation to let it use part of the right of way along Route 7, which connects Purcellville and Bluemont.

The Park Authority has budgeted about $168,000 to acquire land and has pegged roughly $300,000 to build the extension over several years.

The agency hopes to extend the paved trail from its current terminus in the center of Purcellville through the village of Bluemont and to the top of the Blue Ridge at Route 601. Winslow said a short unpaved footpath would extend from that point to the Appalachian Trail

It's not clear what happened (perhaps Allen Muchnick knows?) but obviously the W&OD was never extended. Still, there is reason to keep hope alive. The extension made it into Loudoun County's 2003 Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan and Virginia's 2007 Outoors Plan was mentioned as recently as 2012 by the County's Parks, Recreation and Open Spaces Board (though the typo in the presentation title doesn't instill confidence). 


Maglev rendering with trails

I'm not even sure if this is meant to be the DC-Baltimore maglev, but I like the parallel bike-ped paths below it. If this is what it looks like when it opens in 2092, then count me on board (or not, I'll probably be on the bike path below it, unless global warming has flooded that).

image from

Bike commuting to new FBI Headquarters depends on location (spoiler: Landover is worst)

As GGW wrote last week in a post on how the choices for a new FBI headquarters location, and their proximity to Metro, will impact traffic

The FBI wants to leave its aging headquarters on Pennsylvania Avenue, and many in the District would not be sad to see it go. The FBI, like other security-related agencies, wants a high-security fortress with impenetrable walls and what amounts to a moat. That's not ideal in downtown DC, where shops, restaurants, condominiums, and top-tier office space are all in high demand. The block-size dead zone that is the Hoover Building in its current state is bad enough.

Another, less critical choice when looking at traffic, is how bike-friendly the location will be. And here, as is true with transit, the Greenbelt and Springfield locations are the best locations for multi-modal travel.

The Greenbelt location would place the FBI headquarters on what is currently the Greenbelt Metro parking lot. This is adjacent to Indian Creek, one of the tributaries of the Anacostia along which the Indian Creek Trail runs. That trail currently ends about 2500 feet south of the Metro station at Greenbelt road, but the 2009  Prince George’s County Bicycle Master Plan recommends extending that north, as can be seen in the map below of planned bike facilities in the area.

Greenbelt FBI 

The FBI doesn't plan to expand on this any if they choose this site and they note that building here "would possibly limit the extent of the proposed mixed-use trail on the Greenbelt site." Nonetheless, they expect about 2% of commute trips to be made by bicycle (approximately 226 bicycle roundtrips daily). They add that "It is assumed that there would be bicycle facilities on-site to encourage the use of the bicycle mode of travel." That also assumes that there will be no bikeshare at the site by 2022. 

The Landover site is located near the intersection of Brightseat Road and Landover Road in Prince George’s County. The proposed bike network in this area is a little less extensive, with a sidepath along Landover Road, a trail along Cattail Branch and some nearby bike lanes included in the county bikeway master plan.


Under the build condition, they expect about 1% of commute trips to be made by bicycle (approximately 113 bicycle roundtrips daily). Again, "It is assumed that there would be bicycle facilities on-site to encourage the use of the bicycle mode of travel" and no bikeshare. But the area is so poorly-suited to biking that they aren't sure daily bike commuters here are a good thing "the increase in projected bicycle volumes would have a direct, long-term, adverse impact to the study area. There would be a negative impact because, without bicycle facilities, those who choose to bicycle would need to use sidewalks, conflicting with pedestrians, or use the roadways, creating conflicts with an increased number of vehicles on the road. There could be direct, short-term, adverse impacts to the bicycle network during construction caused by construction vehicles crossing the lanes and intermittent lane and sidewalk closures."

So they have another condition, the build with mitigation condition, that's a little more aggressive stance when it comes to cycling. In this condition, the Landover Road side path and the Brightseat Road and Evarts Street bike lanes be built as part of the project's "roadway mitigation." [If you go to the DEIS, I'm pretty sure that Figure 6-38 is mislabeled as "Recommended Bicycle Mitigation" but is actually the current bike network]. In this condition, they expect "direct, long-term, beneficial impacts caused by the addition of new corridor based bicycle lanes and paths." [For the Greenbelt Alternative, pedestrian network, bicycles, public transit, and truck access do not require any mitigation].

The Springfield site is located south of the FranconiaSpringfield Parkway, east of I-95, and west of the CSX railroad right-of-way. The area is surprisingly well served by bike trails, even if they're counting "a few sidewalk accommodations that appear wide enough to be considered a multi-use path (portions of Frontier Drive)"

A multi-use path is present on the northern side of the site, along Franconia-Springfield Parkway. This trail follows the Franconia-Springfield Parkway and crosses I-95 via a pedestrian bridge near the site, then continues west for several miles, before becoming the Fairfax County Parkway Trail. Near this transition, the trail also connects with the Cross County Trail. There are several other multi-use paths in the study area, including one extending south from the site along Loisdale Road, paths around the Franconia-Springfield Metro Station and along the Franconia-Springfield Metro Station Access Road, a path that connects the Metrorail station to Barry Road through the VRE station, and a multi-use path or wide sidewalk along the eastern side of Frontier Road north of Spring Mall Drive. The Fairfax County Bicycle Master Plan also shows a segment north of and parallel to Metropolitan Center Drive as an existing off-road trail; however, this pathway appears to be very overgrown based on Google aerial imagery from 2015 and may need improvements to be considered a usable mixed-use trail


In addition to the planned bicycle improvements, the Fairfax County Board of Supervisors has committed funds in FY2015-2020 for installing covered bicycle parking to accommodate at least 30 bicycles at the Franconia-Springfield Metro Station and VRE station (FCDOT 2014b). With this project, access driveway pavement, lighting, and security improvements may also be provided. The Board of Supervisors has also committed funds to enhance both bicycle and pedestrian access from the Northern Virginia Community College ‒ Medical Campus, adjacent to the Springfield site, to the Franconia-Springfield Metro Station and nearby activity centers. These improvements would undoubtedly benefit future pedestrians and bicyclists

So Springfield has a lot of facilities, and more in the pipeline, which means, that like Greenbelt, the bicycle mode split to the site is projected to be 2%. 

Unlike Greenbelt, the bicycle network would get some attention in the Build with Mitigation alternative.

Although the “segment north of and parallel to Metropolitan Center Drive” is shown as an existing off-road trail in the Fairfax County Bicycle Master Plan, this pathway appears to be overgrown. Therefore, one recommendation is to rehabilitate this off-road trail along GSA-owned railroad right-of-way as a mixed-use path and create a short bicycle connection along Joseph Alexander Road between the Springfield site and the overgrown trail.

The off-road trail in question is the diagonal blue line just north of the site, and calling it overgrown is charitable. But, a new rail exciting. 

When compared to the Build Condition, there would be improvements to the bicycle network under the Build with Mitigation Condition. The recommended mitigations would improve the level of impact from not measurable to direct, long-term, beneficial bicycle network impacts because the recommended mitigation measures would expand the area’s bicycle network

I say keep pushing that trail south along the railroad line all the way to Ft. Belvoir on it's abandoned railroad network.

So, it may be that - from a bike commuting and bike enhancement standpoint, the Springfield site is the best (though that should be just one small factor). I wonder what the bicycle mode split is at the current HQ.

Capital Bikeshare: Winter is Coming

CaBi announced this on Monday

Corral Service in downtown DC has been a big hit throughout our busy season, thanks to the many trips our members took to these stations. We originally announced that corrals would end in September, but due to their popularity, we extended them for two additional months.

However, as temperatures (and ridership) drop this winter, we are adjusting our corral service for the season.

  • Beginning today, the corral at 21st St & I (Eye) St NW will be CLOSED for the season.

  • Our corral at 13th & New York Ave NW will operate through December 18, 2015.

Corral Service will resume again in the spring. Until then, be sure to check Spotcycle or your nearest station kiosk for bike and dock availability. Don’t forget that you can get 15 additional minutes of ride time if you arrive at a full stataion. Visit the kiosk for more information.

Banner design by

City Paper's Best Local Bike Blog 2009


 Subscribe in a reader