From a Dutch study
The mean total duration of absenteeism over the study year was more than 1 day shorter in cyclists than in non-cyclists. This can be explained by the higher proportion of people with no absenteeism in the cycling group. A dose-response relationship was observed between the speed and distance of cycling and absenteeism. Compared to people who cycle a short distance (<or=5 km) three times a week, people who cycle more often and longer distances are absent for fewer days on average. CONCLUSION: Cycling to work is associated with less sickness absence. The more often people cycle to work and the longer the distance travelled, the less they report sick.




This surely needs a big "correlation does not imply causation" warning. People with chronic health problems and disabilities are less likely to bike commute, and more likely to miss work every now and then.
Posted by: dand | August 06, 2010 at 09:29 AM
Maybe this is why the Dutch pay bike commuters.
Posted by: freewheel | August 06, 2010 at 09:33 AM
I turn this on its head. If I am too sick to bike to work, I'm too sick to go to work in the first place.
Posted by: John | August 06, 2010 at 09:58 AM
I agree from my unscientific self study. Not only that, but I work better at work. Of course, if I fall off the bike and break some bones, all of this is pretty much off the table.
Posted by: SJE | August 06, 2010 at 11:16 AM
dand: I agree. I suspect it's the other way around, i.e., people who get sick more often are less likely to bike commute.
Posted by: Scott F | August 06, 2010 at 09:17 PM
dand: I agree. I suspect it's the other way around, i.e., people who get sick more often are less likely to bike commute.
Posted by: Scott F | August 06, 2010 at 09:17 PM