« Outside the beltway meetings will likely address the I-66 Trail | Main | County approves Bethesda Plan with a few changes to bikeways »

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Is there a reason why the parking wasn't floated off the curb and allow for a PBL?

Could it be because of interference with the bulbed out intersections?

Was a Dutch design considered whereby the PBL would bend behind the bulb out and run alongside the pedestrian crosswalk?

I think there wasn't room. You need another foot or two to do that.

Perhaps the thru lanes could have been reduced to 10' rather than 11'?

There's plenty of room, but DDOT is simply not very creative or is unwilling to reduce parking. We need to step up and starting pushing for better designs, or we'll be stuck with substandard designs for decades to come. Check out a Dutch-style design that fits in easily in the existing roadway dimensions and doesn't require moving storm drains.

Maryland Ave NE protected bike lane

GIF here:
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/bd40fde83ac44e19ae78d2acbb2a1c3e33b3ce33e711dce539affd7e1a4a958e.gif

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

Banner design by creativecouchdesigns.com

City Paper's Best Local Bike Blog 2009

Categories

 Subscribe in a reader