Georgetown Waterfront Rebuild

Ground was recently broken (see photo at left) on the "largest park to be created in the Nation’s Capital...since Constitution Gardens was completed on the National Mall in 1976."  The Georgetown Waterfront Park project will completely reshape a very visible part of the city, and impact - hopefully in a positive way - both the CCT and the Rock Creek Trail.

the park will contain a promenade along the shoreline punctuated with three overlooks - with views of the Potomac River and recreational boaters - from the Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts to Key Bridge. These overlooks will contain sculpted granite slabs etched with historic images of Georgetown’s maritime heritage, a separate bike trail to link the Capital Crescent Trail with the Rock Creek Trail (emphasis mine), a labyrinth containing intertwined pathways for contemplation, edges of native plants to replace aged concrete bulkheads, floral displays, shade and ornamental trees, rain gardens to retain storm water, lights for evening enjoyment, and benches to relax and enjoy the setting.

(I, for one, can't wait to start doing some contemplating). This area, though valuable, has been slow to develop. It was originally a rail yard (you can still see tracks bulging under the asphalt in some spots) used to transfer cargo between the Georgetown Branch railroad (now the CCT), the C&O canal and the Potomac. It was once scheduled to be a freeway. For a long time now, it's been a parking lot. The park is going to be a step up from any of these uses. The post does a good job of covering the history of the project and what it will include.

The third phase of construction would create two separate paths for bicycles and pedestrians, and would install trees and benches, from the Kennedy Center to about a half-mile upstream near Thompson boathouse, where visitors can rent kayaks, canoes and bikes and where many rowers keep their shells.

The work is going to be in three phases, moving gradually downstream.  Once the work is complete, it's hoped that a staircase connecting the Kennedy Center to the waterfront will be created (I'm always shocked that this wasn't built into the original design of the Kennedy Center). From what I understand a promenade will go along the waterfront in Phase One, with the bike trail along K Street/Water Street all the way to Rock Creek. There was hope that a bridge would be built across Rock Creek just south of K Street, (as part of the Swedish Embassy project, but that never materialized). So the bike path will then run south along the west side of Rock Creek to the improved Rock Creek Bridge and then along the Potomac on a separate path from one for runners.

The Swedish Embassy project is almost complete and the connecting space between the Thompson Boat Center and the Washington Harbour is now open (see photo at left).

One further change to the waterfront is being planned. As discussed before, there are plans to build a boat house at the Georgetown trail head of the CCT. WABA, after staying neutral on the subject has come out against THIS boathouse.

The integrity of the Capital Crescent Trail in DC is under threat from the construction of a large boathouse for the crew team of Georgetown University.  Access to the site would require construction equipment, boat trailers and delivery vehicles to share use of the Capital Crescent Trail for a distance of several hundred feet.  The user experience on the trail will be diminished by blocking the views of the river.  In addition, the sheer size of the structure will give the trail a "tunnel-like" feel and create shadows that will prevent the melting of ice during the winter.

The comment period for this project is over. Now we can only sit and wait for the Park Service's decision. That, and write editorials and letters to the editor about it. Harry Jaffe says it so well, that I'll just say I agree (rather than add my own opinion).

»  Georgetown’s proposed boathouse is enormous. At 50 feet high, it would dominate the shoreline from the river and block views from the trails behind.

» It would block parts of the Capital Crescent Trail and bring vehicular traffic onto a path that has been the domain of bikers, walkers and baby carriages for more than a decade.

» The dealings between the National Park Service and Georgetown University are starting to reek of the same scent that came from the NPS arrangements with Redskins owner Dan Snyder and also its plan to close parts of Beach Drive.

The Capital Crescent Trail has become a regular commuting route from Bethesda and a destination for travelers from around the world. It is one of the premier biking trails in the nation. It took years for community groups to negotiate with the Park Service to create the trail. Why obstruct it now?

“I don’t know why the needs of a university rowing program trumps the needs of everyone else,” says Eric Gilliland, executive director for the Washington Area Bicyclist Association.

Thousands of Washingtonians wrote letters to the Park Service opposing the boathouse in the public comment process that ended June 15. Hopefully, the Park Service will have the good sense to reduce the size of the building or move it to an alternative site.

But, to avoid confusion - I think the park is great, I think the boathouse is too big for that spot, and I like to contemplate. 

Comments

[Michael Plakus]

Watch out! Harry posted a second opinion that looks like he is suporting the boathouse now.

[washcycle]

Good Call Michael. Here's that column

http://www.examiner.com/a-169841~Harry_Jaffe__Could_I_be_wrong__GU_s__monster__boathouse_could_be_user_friendly.html

Though it's harly a complete change of opinion.

"Walking the hundred yards where the boathouse would face the trail, I could not see the river through the jungle.

So as a cyclist, a hiker, a father whose daughter rowed for her high school team, as a guy who likes to sit by the Potomac and watch the Mallards dally and the 727’s fly overhead, I have to ask: If Georgetown builds its boathouse, will it make it easier to see the river and get to its banks?

I think — yes."

Well, I disagree. You CAN see the river in the winter - so that will be lost. And his column is really a argument to improve the area. There's no reason you need GU to build a giant boathouse to do this. A smaller, better boathouse could do this too. Or just a bit of land management.