« Bike to Work - The Book! | Main | Bike Theft on rise in Capitol Hill »

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Montgomery County Planners... you are a bunch of spineless tools and should be ashamed of yourselves.

One reason the city of Bowie and many residents want a narrower foot print on MD197 it that SHA's ultimate motives are not clear. With all the wide lanes and wide median, there would be enough room for a furture 6 lane road right through a residantial area. No one in Bowie wants that.

This would also destroy the existing multi-use trail (MUT). The MUT would be reduced to a 6 foot wide path between a busy road and sound walls. Currently it is separatred from the road by a nice island of mature trees, which provides nice shade.

I have been to most of the meetings and never heard any issues about carbon foot prints, just realestate foot prints. With the wide road option SHA would be taking people's property. SHA has not been convincing in the need for such a wide road.

It might be possilbe to preserve the MUT pretty close to it curret state if the road and median was narrowed. Might end up being a choice between separated MUT and on road bike comptible lanes. The bike compatible lanes are NOT bike lanes. There would be no stripe or road markings. It is just a wider lane that is supposed to allow enoungh room for cars to pass. Nothing more.

As it stands SHA has been told to go back to the drawing board due to not addressing the city's or citizen's concerns. In any event they have no money beyond planning work. This kind of back and forth has been going on since 1988.

The 197 upgrade plans are very car centric, despite the bike compatible lanes.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Banner design by creativecouchdesigns.com

City Paper's Best Local Bike Blog 2009

Categories

 Subscribe in a reader