The Chesapeake Beach Railway was built in the 1890's as a connection between the population center of Washington, DC and the resort town of Chesapeake Beach, MD. In 1899 the railway started operation from south Deanwood, where Nannie Helen Burroughs Avenue meets Minnesota Avenue running north of Watts Branch then through Seat Pleasant, Upper Marlboro and Owings on its way to Chesapeake Beach. Highways, fire and the Great Depression all led to the railway being replaced by a bus by 1935. The section within DC continued its operations as the East Washington Railway until 1978.
Ironically, much of the section within Maryland - the section abandoned 70 years ago - has survived, while the short piece in DC was quickly built upon. The DC ROW was just wide enough to place a house and yard on it. Since it parallels Watts Branch (the reason it and the WB&A* chose to utilize that valley to approach the city in the first place) and the soon-to-be-reopened Marvin Gaye Park Trail (MGPT), an alternative exists. In fact riding the MGPT, just west of Division Avenue, you can see an old abutment of the WB&A rail line.
Aside: The old WB&A line in DC was owned by Capitol Transit and thus, I'd figure, by Metro. The East Washington Railway ceased service in the 1970's. In my research I never find out why Metro twice decided not to build a line (or hold on to/acquire land for later expansion) in this area.
Anyway, Maryland plans to build a trail along the ROW (map) and in places already has. It's been acquiring land for this purpose since at least 1999.
The problem is they don't own all of it as M-NCCPC points out.
It was abandoned before railbanking was an option. So instead they're forcing developers to build sections as they develop parcels the trail would sit on. Construction has been, at best, piecemeal.
- A 100-foot long portion was built in Maryland Park between Crown Street and the Addison Plaza shopping center. This is just east of the DC eastern corner.
- When the Walker Mill/Ritchie Marlboro Road intersection with the Beltway was rebuilt, sidewalks were added to serve as the trail in that section.
- In September 2004, the state of Maryland committed $1.6 million for construction of the first 1.4 miles of trail. Construction for the trail was scheduled to begin in the fall of 2005 but has been pushed back to 2008. In October, MD Senate President Thomas Miller said, " Construction is about to begin on the Chesapeake Beach Railway Trail."
During the wait for this last section, it appears it has been expanded.
When asked about the rail trail - and the closing of the Brown Station landfill that it would pass through - in 2007, M-NCCPC replied
Near the Beltway, the Chesapeake Beach Railroad Trail is accommodated with an existing eight-foot wide sidewalk parallel to the road. This wide sidewalk provides safe pedestrian access under the Beltway and can serve as a segment of the longer planned trail. As part of the master plan process, staff can evaluate the feasibility of a separate trail bridge (or tunnel) in this area to better accommodate the master plan trail.
So what Maryland (and to a much smaller extant DC) needs to do is come up with a PLAN to match their plans. The M-NCPPC and state DNR need to put together a formal plan of how the CBRT will be built, where it will run etc...Otherwise we're going to end up with a messy, disconnected trail.
In the short term, Maryland should build the section - now a social trail - from Crown Street in Seat Pleasant to the District Boundary and DC should build the last 20 feet to the corner of Southern and Eastern, as well as a sidepath on Southern and signs and markings to connect it to the MGPT (as mentioned in this UMd Studio Report). Maryland should also build the Chesapeake Beach section.
*I'm not doing anything on the WB&A trail this year, since it's been covered twice already.
I wonder how they will handle crossing the Patuxant River. Following the ROW would require a trail bridge of significant scale. I am also wondering if the land managers at Jug Bay Wetlands Sanctuary will object to a paved trail through the wildlife preserve . . it's public land, but managed for limited access with ecological research as the primary goal.
Posted by: Purple Eagle | December 18, 2008 at 09:02 AM
Purple Eagle,
It looks like the bridge will be small and the impact would be minor since the railway bed is clearly visible on Google Earth. This trail makes perfect sense and would do a lot for Calvert Country by connecting the Patuxant River with the Chesapeake Bay in the northern part of the country.
Posted by: Michael Gallagher | December 30, 2008 at 10:33 AM
Does anybody know the current status of the Chesapeake Beach Rail Trail? As a Chesapeake Beach resident I'm very excited about the prospect of a long, paved pathway to ride my road bike on. I would be more than happy to volunteer some of my time to help with the construction. I consider cycling on the roads in the area dangerous because of the high volume of traffic and small shoulders. A pathway like the Mt. Vernon trail would be ideal.
Posted by: JMJ | October 30, 2009 at 03:52 PM
I call Cheaspeake town hall and i get "they are strating this real soon" for the past three years. I would love help in any way i could. Great history to a great town!!!
Posted by: R.N. | November 24, 2009 at 09:10 PM