The Post wrote about Arlington's new "trike pool" and, despite DCist's ridiculous elitism, I have to wonder if this means Arlington is making a serious play to be the most awesome bike town on the east coast.
Arlington staff employees hit upon the idea as part of their two-year-old program, Fresh AIRE (Arlington Initiative to Reduce Emissions), which already includes hybrid taxis. First they wanted to add bikes to the carpool fleet, said Shannon Whalen-McDaniel, spokeswoman for the county's Department of Environmental Services. They began an "investigative process," checking out hundreds of bikes.
Ultimately, the county purchased six trikes for just under $500 each, along with six bicycles. Since the bikes were rolled out last fall, 140 of the county's 3,600 employees have registered to ride.
Right on. I'd love to see SmartBike add a handful of trikes to their fleet. I mean Zipcar doesn't just rent Honda Accords. Sometimes you may need something sturdier and able to carry more. Or big trailers.
Most of the commenter on DCist, BTW, disagreed with Ms. Mr. Capps. They think it's a good idea too.
I argued having a differential set of bicycles on the worldcitybike list, but people weren't into the idea. The SmartBike system needs to be set up like Zipcar, in that they have a differentiated set of vehicles, designed to meet a variety of needs.
Right now, the SmartBike system is designed to meet only one type of need.
Alternatively, if we had transportation demand management planning and transportation management districts, this could be another way to provide additional mobility options. I.e., I think that places like Eastern Market should have trikes/cargo bikes that people could borrow to take their purchases home. Etc.
Posted by: Richard Layman | April 22, 2009 at 12:04 PM
I am a boy! And I stand firm against the specter of tricyclism. Keep it on that side of the river!
Posted by: Kriston Capps | April 22, 2009 at 01:57 PM
The idea of adding tricycles to SmartBike is interesting, but there are issues of practicality. Vélib already has problems with asymmetry: bikes tend to be rented at the tops of hills and end up at the bottom, for instance. What will happen to those cargo bikes/tricycles that people rent at Eastern Market and take into neighborhoods where there is less interest in this kind of heavy-duty transport?
Vélib works, in part, because it deploys one model of practical (i.e. multi-purpose) bike on a massive scale. This makes it easy to keep kiosks compact, facilitates repair, and minimizes "symmetry" issues of the sort I mention above.
My inclination is to keep things single, but scale up... big time.
Posted by: guez | April 22, 2009 at 02:29 PM
It's also worth noting that ZipCar doesn't allow one-way trips; each individual car has its own space that it must be returned to. SmartBikes can be rented anywhere and left anywhere. That would make it hugely more difficult to manage a variety of types of bikes.
Posted by: Scott F | April 22, 2009 at 04:54 PM
Kriston Capps, sorry about that, I should've looked it up.
I agree that simple is better. But options are good too. There must be a way to make it work, though I can't think of it right now.
Posted by: Washcycle | April 22, 2009 at 11:05 PM
Specialty bikes like could be part of any bike sharing system, they would just have different rules. Cargo bikes could be rented under the same terms as regular bikes, but would have to be returned to the stand from where they were taken. This would be similar to going to a special location to access a particular car sharing vehicle.
Posted by: MikeJ | April 23, 2009 at 09:48 AM
MikeJ,
I don't see how this would work. Wouldn't you have make two extra trips: one to return the cargo bike, the other to get back home? This ends up being like having to rent a Zipcar to get to a Zipvan to lug stuff home, and then having to drive the Zipvan back, and then rent *another* Zipcar (to get home).
Simple=better.
Posted by: guez | April 24, 2009 at 03:29 AM