« WAGBRAD II: Cruise Control (Sponsored by Anti-Monkey Butt Powder) | Main | Poplar Point, Second Try »

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Diez was just trying to protect the 3-year old from further dangerous bicycling putings by shooting his father. That's logiocal thinking right there. No dad, fewer or no bike trips in dangerous areas. Seems perfectly reasonable to me.

Again a good argument for "Guns don't kill people, people kill people".

On the U-lock: maybe if we had a National U-Lock Association, the person using the U-Lock to defend his freedom from some aggressive pedestrian could sue that person. The NUA would cover the court costs. This could be the next big issue: The right to bear a U-Lock.

BTW, that video is so fake.

A guy filming all this and all he says is "Jesus"? Camera ready and rolling just as the fight begins, not offering to help (not even yelling anything) while the beating is in progress or after the guy leaves?

Ridiculous.

Nice title. I so far have avoided blogging this one myself but as the Asheville paper keeps doing stories each day and the locals keep spotting off about how the shooter was in the right (WTF?) I may have to have a rant myself.

Wow Eric, Kryptonite just asked me to register my lock. Now I know why. It's the first step towards total confiscation. First ban the U-locks, then frame pumps, finally my little 8 mm pocket wrench.

Damn good thing he was wearing a helmet. Everybody should, include the guy on the wrong end of the U-lock incident.

OK, out of an abundance of caution: I ended my first post with the line "sarcasm off" but I must have used "<>" which is why it did not appear.

I think people got the message but I wanted to be clear. Especially after I read some of the comments to the newspaper article where someone has pretty much the same direction but without the "sarcasm" addition.

Jack, we should get together and establish the DC Chapter of the NUA.

eric w: have you been to NYC? I'm surprised the guy even said Jesus. coming from a new yorker, the fact that he even took the time to film it seems like an overreaction to me.

first of all police/fire/army-type guys driving big 4x4s almost universally loose their minds when they get behind the wheel. Second, never attempt to talk to motorist while biking in the first place - they loose their minds nearly every time.

When you see some police/fire/army dude pull over in his 4x4 shouting complaints about your cycling, he most likely has it in mind to run you over from behind or shoot you in the back of the head. I would have asssumed that much already.

JTS: Your comment made me laugh!

Lee: You may be right. I try to be a good rider and tell drivers whenever possible about broken brake lights adn so on.

They won't run me over if I just was nice to them. (I hope)

> try to be a good rider and tell drivers whenever possible about broken brake lights adn so on.

oh, now that's just looking for trouble.... the only time I'd ever talk to a driver is to say "i don't know", and even then it would have to be a direct question. Drivers are impatient - if you have nothing to say they'll just drive away. Nothing positive will ever result from talking to them.

And turning his back on this guy was a big mistake. Standing your ground is critical when someone is flipping out like that.

Lee, not sure what to respond to this except maybe that perpetuating adversarial relationships does not seem productive.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Banner design by creativecouchdesigns.com

City Paper's Best Local Bike Blog 2009

Categories

 Subscribe in a reader