The man who pleaded no contest to stealing Lance Armstrong's bike in Sacramento was sentenced to three years in prison for burglary and theft.
Another man, 33-year-old Dung Hoang Le of Elk Grove, pleaded no contest
June 1 to receiving stolen property. He has been sentenced to 90 days
in jail, to be served on the sheriff's work project.
Man, I would love to see some local bike thieves thrown in jail. [So far this year, there have been 267 reported bike thefts in DC].
"Theif"
I before E except after C... ;-)
Intresting news item and +1 on the local bike thieves... I say that as someone who officially reported a bike theft to MPD a few years ago,(my bike having been stolen after thieves made a forced entry into a locked garage in Brookland).
Posted by: Eric | July 08, 2009 at 12:24 PM
Seriously. Three years!?
What do you think had happened if someone had stolen a bike from you or me and they had actually apprehended the thief? I am pretty sure the sentence would have been a lot less than three years.
Three years seems a lot for a bike theft (even if the bike was expensive). The guy obviously is a career criminal so he might have had it coming.
Let's hope for good work on the part of our local PDs on actually catching some bike thieves!
Posted by: Eric_W. | July 08, 2009 at 12:33 PM
Yeah three years did seem a little stiff, and I doubt that any thief of my less-than-$500 bike would get anything close to three years.
I think you're dead on with the career criminal part. In fact, sounds like he may have actually gotten off easy, though I doubt the max senetence is doled out too often. California code says:
461. Previous conviction — Punishment. — A defendant found guilty of burglary in the second degree, and a previous conviction of grand larceny, may be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for a term of ten years. People v. Brooks, 65 Cal. 300.
(Gotta love Google)
It would be interesting to see a study on bias in the sentencing/conviction rate for bike thieves vis-a-vis car thieves. Naturally the sentences would probably be generally stiffer for car thieves b/c cars are generally worth more than cars, but trying to control for that...
In any case, there certainly seems to be a bias towards cars and against bikes when it comes to police willingness or ability to track down the perps.
Posted by: Eric | July 08, 2009 at 01:26 PM
I suspect that a big factor in the sentence is that he stole LANCE ARMSTRONG's bike.
Posted by: SJE | July 08, 2009 at 03:22 PM
Spellcheck doesn't work on the title for some reason...also they aren't teaching i before e anymore.
Posted by: Washcycle | July 08, 2009 at 03:40 PM
The bike was worth $10,000 so that may have bumped it up from larceny to grand larceny or something.
Posted by: Washcycle | July 08, 2009 at 04:00 PM
But if you happen to kill a cyclist while driving your car, you usually just get a fine under $1000 and no time.
Posted by: Nancy | July 08, 2009 at 06:08 PM
Same is true if you kill a guy on a motorcycle or a passenger in your car.
Posted by: Washcycle | July 08, 2009 at 06:15 PM