« More Bike Sharing Maps | Main | Street Smart »

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

I think the results could be skewed by insurance. A minor scrape with a pedestrian, cyclist or other car, or fall off the bike, would probably not get reported unless the other party wants to make an issue of it. Given that the cost of even minor body work on a car exceeds the costs of most bikes, even fender benders are more likely to be reported.

The other issue is visibility. If two cars bump, the owners stop and chat for at least a few minutes. This blocks traffic, and you soon get a police presence. A scrape between two cyclists is unlikely to block traffic, as they can easily move to the sidewalk.

also skewed by MPD's policy of only reporting crashes with $1k of damage or an injury.

Yep, that would skew it enormously. You would only see the more serious bike accidents, but less serious car accidents. This makes bikes look unsafe.

It would be like looking at pedestrian safety only in those in which a ped was severely injured, and therefore not counting the number of times peds are almost hit or only bruised, or the total number of pedestrians.

In 2008 there 341 bicycles in collisions, 1 of which was fatal and 256 of which resulted in injuries. This gives bicycles the lowest survivability ratio (1:341) of any vehicle except motorcycles

Yep, as the posters above have implied, the only bicycle collisions that are reported are those where someone has been injured, or there's been severe property loss, or the bicyclist is some sort of tenacious pro-cycling malcontent [:)].

The comments to this entry are closed.

Banner design by creativecouchdesigns.com

City Paper's Best Local Bike Blog 2009

Categories

 Subscribe in a reader