DDOT recently completed the Draft Concept Plan for the South Capitol Street Trail. This new trail will connect the Douglass Bridge, the military employment centers along the Potomac, Ward 8 neighborhoods and the trail to the Wilson Bridge. Currently, a cyclist can ride south on this route, but can not go north, so the trail would create a brand new connection. The $5.7 million project would be done in four phases (including an interim connection to the Oxon Run Trail). It would overcome the numerous pinch points along the trail by narrowing the roadway - with little to no impact on traffic according to their traffic studies.
The main trail itself starts at the intersection of S. Capitol St and Firth Sterling Avenue where the current trail off the Douglass Bridge ends. It crosses the streetcar tracks at grade and then runs on the west side of S. Cap (and east of the streetcar for as long as that goes) to the intersection of Overlook Avenue. It then moves to the west side of Overlook to Laboratory Road. Just before Laboratory it crosses to the east side of Overlook and then crosses Laboratory to follow along the south side of that. It would then become a sidepath along Shepherd Parkway, Blue Plains Drive and DC Village Lane to the existing trail connection to Oxon Hill Farm.
In addition, an interim connection would be built between S. Cap and Oxon Run Park and the trail there. The bike plan called for this connection to be a sidepath along S. Cap, but that route is narrow with grade issues, walls, and numerous intersections and driveways. The updated concept is to instead build the connection as an on-road route along Halley Pl, 1st St and Atlantic St SE. Within this corridor, all of the streets are too narrow for bike lanes; however shared lane markings are feasible.
Design
Most of the trail will be 10' wide with up to 10' of separation from the road and a 3' buffer on the other side. But even in the preferred alternative, the trail will be as narrow as 8' with no separation or buffer in a few places. This is because of eight pinch points along the route. In most cases the plan is to overcome these pinch points by narrowing the roadway, removing a lane or both. Where lanes are removed the level of service to drivers is mostly unchanged. At South Capitol and MacDill it drops from a C to a D in the AM and at South Capitol and Malcolm X it drops from an A to a B in the PM.
The narrowest planned location is pinchpoint 3.2 just north of the point where the I-295 exit ramp connects to Overlook Avenue. There is only 22 feet and the trail will get 8 of them.
Pinchpoint between Overlook Ave and Defense Blvd
Another trouble spot is at the light rail platform just south of Firth Sterling. No space was set aside for the trail, so the trail will cross the tracks just north of the station and then use space taken from the roadway between the new road and the station. The design calls for textured paving to deliniate the trail.
Trail near the streetcar platform
Phases
The trail is to be built in four phases.
Phase I constructs the interim trail from South Capitol and Overlook to Oxon Run Park. This is an on-road route with widened and completed sidewalks and costs $100,000
Phase II is the construction of the trail within DC Village. DC village is going through a redevelopment project and the future trail alignment within this segment will be refined once the redevelopment proceeds further. This phase will be done in conjunction with the DC Village work.
Phase III includes the trail from Laboratory Road to Malcolm X Avenue, where the trail connects with the proposed trail along the DHS access road. For this reason, the report recommends that this phase be coordinated with the proposed improvements to I-295/ South Capitol Street, as a part of the DHS redevelopment.
Phase IV completes the trail by building the section from Malcolm X to Firth Sterling. The intersection at Firth Sterling is also dependent on the St Elizabeths-DHS project.
Combined with the St. Elizabeths trail and the Oxon Run Trails, this becomes one piece in an integrated and nearly complete trail system in southern DC.
Fingers crossed. Not ridden this for quite some time, but the southbound access road this will replace was one of the scariest pieces of high-curbed, zooming-car real estate I ever cycled.
Posted by: Read Scott Martin, 13th Street NE | December 30, 2010 at 07:23 AM
Thanks for the write-up!
Posted by: Roy | December 30, 2010 at 08:04 AM
I rode this (south-bound) regularly this summer. As Read Scott Martin notes, it can put you near some fast traffic, but the road is so wide that it never really made me cringe. So, for southbound purposes, this'll be a nice plus, but not necessary. On the other hand, this will make a world's worth of difference heading north, to the point that I wonder if it won't attract some new across-the-Wilson-Bridge commuters for Bolling AFB.
Posted by: MB | December 30, 2010 at 09:08 AM
The only thing is that the Shared Use Path Level of Service document recommends a minimum 11 foot width, even though the draft AASHTO guide on bicycle facilities still says 10 feet.
http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/safety/pedbike/05138/
You could argue with me about the interpretation. What it says is that the AASHTO recommendations are fine, but higher use situations support wider widths.
Here's what it says exactly:
The findings of this study provide strong support for the standard trail width guidance provided in the AASHTO Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities .(2) Trails having 2.4-m (8.0-ft) width, which AASHTO recommends only in "rare instances," were found to have poor LOS, except at very low volumes or with user mixes that included few pedestrians and runners. The findings of this research support AASHTO's minimum "recommended paved width for a two-directional shared-use path of [3.0 m] ten feet." [8]
The study found that widths of 3.4–4.6 m (11.0–15.0 ft) provide improved LOS for higher volumes and more balanced user mixes than narrower widths. This is consistent with AASHTO recommendations that "under certain conditions it may be necessary or desirable to increase the width of a shared-use path to 3.8 m (12.0 ft) or even to 4.3 m (14.0 ft), due to substantial use by bicycles, joggers, skaters and pedestrians, ...." [9] Trails of 3.4–4.6 m (11.0–15.0 ft) are wide enough to operate as three-lane paths. The increased passing capacity provided by a trail that operates as three lanes improves LOS and increases the trail's ability to absorb higher volumes and more diverse mode splits without severely degrading service.
Posted by: Richard Layman | December 30, 2010 at 10:39 AM
Any idea whether this is--or would logically become--the Potomac Heritage Trail alignment? I've asked Potomac Heritage Trail Association for a map, but most website on that trail are all talk.
South Capitol Street trail is key to motivating a bridge over I-295 in MD to connect Woodrow Wilson Bridge to Oxon Run bridge, which you obviously are thinking about with the link to Woodrow Wilson Bridge. I am thinking that the Potomac Heritage Trail might provide the bureaucratic logic to get MD and DC to keep eachother in the loop, as well as a third voice paying attention.
Posted by: Jim Titus | December 31, 2010 at 10:04 AM
Good strategy.
Posted by: Richard Layman | January 01, 2011 at 02:47 PM
I had assumed that the PHT would follow the Mt. Vernon Trail along the VA side of the river . . that might even be the designated route now. I know that the hiking trail from Roosevelt Island to the Am. Legion Bridge is part of the PHT.
Posted by: Purple Eagle | January 01, 2011 at 03:53 PM
Below the head of tide, the trail is on both sides of the river. From Woodrow Wilson Bridge Trail, it follows Oxon Hill road as shown in this map of the Prince Georges County section of the Potomac Heritage Trail.
The NPS website provides a crude overview of the Potomac Heritage Trail showing a route through DC. But that map does not show any roads, making the actual alignment impossible to discern. One get the impression that there might be two alignments, one along South Capitol and one along Oxon Run--but that is a wild guess looking at that map.
Posted by: Jim Titus | January 02, 2011 at 08:44 AM
Jim Hudnall responded to the email to the Potomac Heritage Trail group, and stated:
"The South Capitol Street Trail would become a segment of the PHNST after designation by NPS." I think we can assume that such designation would be forthcoming. Meanwhile, he writes:
"From the entrance to the Anacostia Naval Air Station, the route goes on Firth Sterling, Sumner Place, Martin Luther King Avenue, and Blue Plains Drive to the Oxon Cove Trail. The route could have gone on South Capitol Street and Overlook Avenue to Blue Plains, but that route is not good going northbound because part of Overlook Avenue by Bolling AFB is one-way southbound. It is a shame the route cannot use the trail along the Potomac River, but DOD will never let that happen."
Posted by: Jim Titus | January 04, 2011 at 08:02 AM
@Washcycle. Do you think maybe its time to add a Potomac Heritage Trail category?
Posted by: Jim Titus | January 04, 2011 at 08:04 AM
Is the PHT a bike trail? My impression is that it is primarily a hiking trail.
Posted by: washcycle | January 04, 2011 at 09:03 AM
Probably both. The NPS Potomac heritage website shows several cyclists passing a horse. From the Anacostia River to Point Lookout in Maryland, it is mostly an on-road bike trail, with some offroad segments planned. In Prince Georges County, the primary local stakeholder group is the Oxon Hill Bicycle Club, which is pushing PG-DPTW to post signs for the trail from the Woodrow Wilson Bridge to the Charles County Line.
Posted by: Jim Titus | January 04, 2011 at 07:14 PM
To follow up on Jim's response - officially, the PHT follows the C&O Canal towpath from DC to Cumberland, and the new (ish) paved multi-user trail from there to Pittsubrgh. All of that is bike-able. The only parts of the route that are primarily for hiking are the trail from Roosevelt Is. to the American Legion Bridge, and the Laurel Highlands Trail.
Posted by: Purple Eagle | January 04, 2011 at 10:00 PM
Any idea when all this is supposed to be complete and bikeable?
Posted by: mc | January 18, 2011 at 10:54 AM
Several years. Detailed engineering, a Categorical Exclusion (for environmental impacts), and of course finding funding for construction all have to take place first.
Posted by: Froggie | January 18, 2011 at 10:57 AM
I haven't seen any dates.
Posted by: washcycle | January 18, 2011 at 11:03 AM