« Bike-truck crash on 14th St NW | Main | Opportunity is knocking »

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Heads up,

The Navy Yard Waterfront gates will close at 1300 today (Thursday 5/12).

Crash reporting is definitely a problem in Virginia. The ACPD officer in charge of reporting in Arlington gave a presentation/took questions from a joint meeting of the bike, pedestrian, etc. committees a few months ago, and my takeaway was that we have almost no reliable information about crashes involving bikes and pedestrians. This is due in part to the reporting threshold ($1k in damage or a hospital visit), ACPD discouragement of reporting, and an antiquated back end on the reporting system itself. It's shameful.

Under Virginia law, a bicyclist operating on a trail, sidewalk or crosswalk has the rights and duties of a pedestrian. So a collision between a cyclist and a pedestrian, or between two cyclists, is the same as a collision between two pedestrians.

I find this trend of altering signs very disturbing. I mean, what will happen when the Zombie Apocalypse actually happens?

--Concerned Citizen

Proposed nicknames for the ospreys:

Ana and Costia.

That may be the law, but it is still bad policy. We should track all crashes, and stop labeling cyclists as pedestrians. In DC there is no box for cyclist. So they check pedestrian and then in the comments put "cyclist."

Uuuuuuuuuuuuuh! Braaaains! Uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuh!

BRAAAAAAAINSonyourleftBRAAAAAAAINS

Proposed nicknames for the ospreys: Frederick and Douglas, no wait that will just flare up the same sex union issue.


That may be the law, but it is still bad policy. We should track all crashes, and stop labeling cyclists as pedestrians. In DC there is no box for cyclist. So they check pedestrian and then in the comments put "cyclist."

I agree that in general more reporting can only be a good thing. My point is that in Virginia they're at least following the law. My understanding is that in DC the MPD will report cyclist crash victims as pedestrians even when they are vehicle operators (i.e., in the road).

What would be best would be to have the police report separately the mode -- pedestrian, cyclist, motorist -- and the location -- sidewalk, crosswalk, roadway, trail, etc.

Agreed. In Denver they have these cool tricorder-type devices that mark the locations of things via GPS, take photos, adjust the form based on previous questions (ex. If one participant is a cyclist, it asks "were they wearing a helmet"), etc... I first heard about it 5 years ago. Sigh.

Actually, I was hit by a cyclist this morning on the Custis trial. Idiot turned into the trail on the wrong side and hit me.

I suspect they are not being reported because it isn't worth the hassle. Even if you're injured, there is no need for police reports for an insurance?

Damn lycra people. he could have have at least said sorry.

@charlie. I suspect they are not being reported because it isn't worth the hassle. Even if you're injured, there is no need for police reports for an insurance?


Why? Doesn't home owner's insurance cover this? Have all the insurance companies agreed to an informal "no fault" approach for bicycle crashes?

Are there penalties for sidewalk crashes in downtown D.C.? Some guy on a bike virtually plowed through a crowd on the sidewalk (I was on the edge walking to dinner) that was watching emergency workers treat someone in the park to the north of the White House. I don't know if he did hit anybody in front or behind me, but I felt angry, as a bike commuter, that he acted so recklessly.

@JimT; I have no idea. If I was injured in a bike crash, which insurance company would cover me? I don't think my medical does?

And if I injure someone else, who would cover that?

The comments to this entry are closed.

Banner design by creativecouchdesigns.com

City Paper's Best Local Bike Blog 2009

Categories

 Subscribe in a reader