In addition to Bike to Work week, it's American Craft Beer Week. Coincidence? Just don't combine the two (at least the drinking part, craft away..)
- The DCBAC has ticket data for bicyclists and pedestrians. For example in 2010, there were 334 tickets issued to cyclists for $6183 total. That includes everything from running a Traffic control device, to not having a bell equipped to riding on the sidewalk in the CBD. Last year, 6 cyclists got tickets for excessive speed.
- Alexandria has money for 6 CaBi stations and they hope to install them by next spring. That doesn't count CMAQ money for FY 2013.
- The 1983 Bike to Work day had 1500 participants. Were any readers there? I was busy with bus to school day.
- A section of the Four Mile Run Trail at Glencaryn Park near 3rd and Harrison Street will be closed for storm/sewer systems re-lining. Detour signs will be in place.
- The League of American Bicyclists is having a contest for Bike to Work Day. You can win stuff. Also, you can become a member.
- Washingtonian has a story of Capital Bikeshare after 1 year. I would start the clock when the first bikes were rented, but they're counting from the time DDOT and Arlington teamed up (either that or this is from the future). "At the end of its first eight months, CaBi already has nearly 12,000 annual members and averages 4,000 to 5,000 rides a day....Anticipating increased ridership during the National Cherry Blossom Festival, he doubled the size of the bike station near the USDA building at 12th Street and Independence Avenue, Southwest. It worked: The system saw a big bump in 24-hour users for the three weeks during the festival. At last count, Capital Bikeshare has served about 21,000 single-day pass riders since its launch; at $5 a person, the numbers really add up."
- Local alley cat triple crown race. Three races, three cities, three days.
Visualizations of Custis trail use... http://planitmetro.com/2011/05/13/learning-about-bicycle-commuters/
Posted by: Smooz | May 17, 2011 at 07:40 AM
Is having a bell a legal requirement? I didn't know that...
Posted by: Ben | May 17, 2011 at 10:07 AM
Either a bell or a horn.
Posted by: washcycle | May 17, 2011 at 10:49 AM
Why does a throat not count as an audible device capable of being heard 100 ft?
Posted by: Mark Williams | May 17, 2011 at 11:14 AM
Because it doesn't. Don't fight it. Buy a dang bell already. Everyone you pass on the trail will thank you.
Posted by: Krickey7 | May 17, 2011 at 11:21 AM
I really cannot fathom this reluctance to buy and use a damn bell. Its about $10-20, very small, weighs a few hundred grams, works, legally required and makes other road/trail users happy.
Posted by: SJE | May 17, 2011 at 11:28 AM
I actually disagree. If someone knows of some evidence that a bell increases safety I'd love to see it, but otherwise it's a dumb law. Even if you have a bell, there is no requirement to ever use it (I don't think "trail rules" rise to the level of law).
Posted by: washcycle | May 17, 2011 at 11:29 AM
As a law, it may be dumb, but still the law. Save your ammunition for bigger fights than this one.
As a trail rule, it's a good one. A bell is more conducive to trail harmony than the average raised voice, and lends a note of musical grace to the commute.
Posted by: Krickey7 | May 17, 2011 at 11:39 AM
"On the left" and ringing bells doesn't seem to scale once you get to a certain level of trail traffic - riding in Seattle last year I was the only person ringing madly away until I came to realize the local point of view that seems far more selective as to when it may be useful to ring ring etc.
Posted by: michael n | May 17, 2011 at 11:41 AM
Whether its a dumb law or not, what is the cost of compliance? I can see a better argument for not stopping at stop signs. But a bell?
Posted by: SJE | May 17, 2011 at 11:53 AM
I think Bells are great. I have been riding for 25 years. Audible warnings such as "left" usually cause pedestrians to jump - and not necessarily in the correct direction. Where as a Bell usually results in a slight hand wave from the pedestrian - as in "I heard you and thanks." Bells are extremely effective.
Posted by: bArlington | May 17, 2011 at 12:07 PM
From the cognitive perspective, a bell should be more effective as it is unique and specific to a bicycle, while a voice might be tuned out.
Posted by: SJE | May 17, 2011 at 12:25 PM
Where as a Bell usually results in a slight hand wave from the pedestrian - as in "I heard you and thanks.
I ride the W&OD all the time and the MVT when craving adventure and crisis. I have used bells on both these trails and never observed that reaction.
Posted by: Christopher Fotos | May 17, 2011 at 12:36 PM
A bell is more conducive to trail harmony than the average raised voice, and lends a note of musical grace to the commute.
You've never heard my raised voice.
I don't have a bell, but I rode for a long time with one of those Honka Hoota horns--which was fantastic. You could make it sound like the classic Harpo horn, or like a European ambulance. Very versitile.
Didn't fit on my oversized-diameter bars, though, so now I slow down when passing, and make a kind of clucking noise as I go by.
Haven't had any complaints.
Posted by: oboe | May 17, 2011 at 12:56 PM
a Bell usually results in a slight hand wave from the pedestrian - as in "I heard you and thanks."
My subtle clucking noise is loud enough to register, and occasionally I get a mild wave from the pedestrian. It tends to attract geese though; I guess nothing's perfect.
Posted by: oboe | May 17, 2011 at 12:58 PM
A bell is more conducive to trail harmony than the average raised voice
Except when two riders ring at the same time. A little part of me dies every time I hear bike bells ringing out of tune.
Posted by: Ron Alford | May 17, 2011 at 01:08 PM
A bell in an urban area with high traffic noise or on a trail full of joggers ruining their hearing with iPod ear buds is worthless more than half the time as a genuine warning of an approaching bike. None the less I would propose that all cyclists have and use bells routinely for a very important reason - it's distinctive in a positive way. How many times have writers of anti bike editorial diatribes and letters to the editor mentioned spandex or yellow jackets as being emblematic of cyclists? If we are to be recognized as having a common thread let it be for our proactive use of bells everywhere, all the time to announce our arrival on the scene. Make it a meme that every cyclist from the K St lawyer spandexed from head to toe on his $10K carbon fiber wonder bike to the Takoma Park hippie on her Portland cargo bike to the immigrant brick layer in Ward 4 on his pawn shop special has a bell and uses it whenever, wherever. A fair amount of press is being generated these days about how bikes are in their renaissance. A movement needs, along with a visual image an anthem, a sound that resonates, that sticks in the head. Absent a universal bike theme song how about bells?
Just a thought. ( Besides I love ringing my bell passing thru the stone tunnel on the CCT )
Posted by: Riley | May 17, 2011 at 01:11 PM
Four Mile Run Trail near 3rd and Harrison St. has some mighty steep hills. They're pretty short (a couple hundred feet at the most) but quite a challenge. In fact, that's the only time I've ever thought that I might fall directly backwards while riding a bike in the DC area.
Fortunately, the main trails are not that steep. It's the turnoff up to Harrison that is the real test. So if anyone of you are hankering for a short but tough challenge, check out that trail entrance. Use your brakes if you're going downhill from Harrison. If you're going in the other direction, simply try not to fall over backwards on the bike. And take in plenty of oxygen as you ride up!
Posted by: Michael H. | May 17, 2011 at 02:02 PM
The law requiring a bell or other audible device says nothing about trails. I ride mostly in the street and find a bell damn near worthless.
Posted by: Mark Williams | May 17, 2011 at 02:13 PM
Perhaps Washcycle Industries could produce a bell with a unique tone, marking the user as one of the cycling cognoscenti.
Posted by: Krickey7 | May 17, 2011 at 02:16 PM
What sort of tone would a 6Al/4V titanium bell make?
Posted by: oboe | May 17, 2011 at 02:43 PM
Like bArlington, I've also found using a bell does get me hand waves, and even the occasional "thank you". Indispensable tool, imho. Of course I still use my voice in certain circumstances, as well.
Now to totally geek-out on bells: Over the years I have tried many different bells, and have found my favorite being the very benign (children's?) "ching-ching" style. The majority of people seem to respond really well to it. There is a surprising amount of versatility and ring control in that type of bell too, as it lets you adjust the ring to the situation.
This makes me wonder about cars, and why they only come with one form of horn. Would it hurt the manufacturers to add a calmer audible signal for drivers to communicate with peds and cyclists?
Is there a bell app yet?
Posted by: Max | May 17, 2011 at 02:47 PM
I keep meaning to get a bell, as I ride on the CCT quite a bit and get tired of saying "On your left" all the time. However, I find my voice to be quite as effective as a bell, and louder, if necessary. I also get waves and thanks for warning people verbally, so bells ain't all that.
Posted by: Nancy | May 17, 2011 at 08:38 PM
Washcycle industries is working on a loud siren device that makes announcements sure to get people out of your way. Things like "my brakes don't work" and "I have explosive diarreah".
I think a bell is useful. I'm just not sure requiring people to have one makes us any safer, and thus I'm not a fan of the law. It's not something worth making a big stink over, but if I were asked to do a rewrite, I'd leave it out.
Posted by: washcycle | May 17, 2011 at 09:13 PM
Most bicycle equipment laws seem to be written by people who have no knowledge of cycling or engineering, and seem to be a knee-jerk response: automobiles have equipment laws, so bikes must need them too. Cars have to have horns, so bikes have to have bells.
What's interesting to me is that many states have scaled way back on their equipment laws, at least for passenger cars. Many states and DC have gotten rid of mandatory periodic inspections, because they found it had little impact on safety. When I was a kid growing up in Massachusetts, every car had to be inspected twice a year -- and the whole state had the same deadlines, March 31 and September 30. It's hard to believe people put up with that idiocy.
I'd like to think that as equipment requirements become less of a burden on drivers they will relax on cyclists as well.
Posted by: Contrarian | May 17, 2011 at 10:51 PM