« Driver of Camaro who attacked cyclist was arrested | Main | Major Taylor Project tries to get kids biking »
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
The comments to this entry are closed.
Banner design by creativecouchdesigns.com
City Paper's Best Local Bike Blog 2009
We have a similar problem on Eisenhower Ave in Alexandria.
Posted by: Froggie | July 16, 2011 at 08:13 AM
Not even close to as much of a hazard as the tracks. Good thing the streetcars are running so we're at least getting some benefit... wait, what?
Posted by: Dave | July 16, 2011 at 12:05 PM
at least with streetcars you know their path. they won't be like busses and swerve all over the place. I'd much rather have to deal with stationary track and set-path vehicles than busses.
Posted by: guest | July 16, 2011 at 12:22 PM
Yeah, those streetcar tracks are deadly to anything under 2" tires.....
Posted by: think a little | July 16, 2011 at 05:29 PM
It's a trade-off...transit accessibility via streetcar vs bicycle accessibility. Which is partly why Arlington is planning a bike boulevard on a route parallel to Columbia Pike instead of on Columbia Pike itself.
Fortunately, there are nearby options to H St NE...namely K St NE. Easier grade across the tracks, too, compared to the Hopscotch Bridge.
Posted by: Froggie | July 17, 2011 at 02:56 PM
Is there a reason for putting grates running parallel to traffic? Do transportation departments do this by default, or do they put them out at random and cyclists only notice when they do it wrong?
It seems like this is a recurring problem and I'm wondering if the issue is just not getting the message out, or if there are in fact genuine competing priorities.
Posted by: Contrarian | July 17, 2011 at 09:05 PM
I think if the grates are perpendicular to traffic it is noisier for cars.
Posted by: Mike | July 18, 2011 at 02:25 PM
i almost brake my leg on one of this
Posted by: alex | August 25, 2011 at 09:14 PM