Yesterday, I highlighted the results of the study of three new bike facilities in DC. Today I'm going to highlight some of the recommendations from the study.
In General
- On 15th Street, results show that the use of signs indicating that bicyclists should use the pedestrian signals is not effective. Bicyclists should use either the motor vehicle signal indications or bicycle-specific signals depending on intersection specifics.
- To help bicyclists understand the traffic control that applies to them, the application of bike signals should be consistent along a particular facility.
- the appropriateness of mixing zones depends strongly on turning volumes; at intersections with high volumes of turning vehicles, separating bicycle movements from turning vehicles through protected bicycle signal phases is likely to be most appropriate.
- While this research did not examine colored pavement, we nonetheless recommend the use of colored pavement specifically for conflict areas rather than for entire bicycle facilities.
There are also specific recommendations.
On 15th they recommend adding bicycle signal heads, flashing turn signals for motorists and green pavement at the conflict areas. They also recommend improving the pavement conditions for southbound cyclists through repaving, widening, and/or removing the gutter and improving signal timing.
On Penn, they recommend improving the signs, signals and markings; adding bicycle-only through phases and signals; and improving the pavement markings to show cyclists where to stop.
At NH/U street they recommend restrictin trucks making eastbound right turns; increasing the street cross-section width at the southwest New Hampshire intersection entrance to make room for the bike lane; adding green paint; adding a push button for cyclists or adding a bike phase to every light cycle; improve visibility of the signal heads; and modify the signal phasing.
I feel that bike commuters using the 15th street cycle track know they are supposed to use the pedestrian signals but make the choice not to. There are signs at every intersection, it's pretty clear.
Posted by: UrbanEngineer | April 20, 2012 at 08:20 AM
Yep.
Repaving! Thank you!
And nothing about dooring. Interesting.
Posted by: charlie | April 20, 2012 at 09:24 AM
"removing the gutter" - how is that possible? DDOT screwed up when measuring the lane and including the gutter space. Leaves and water collect there, making it unusable, plus the gutter often has a dangerous downward curve. Not to mention the number of times I've seen pedestrians blithely step into the lane without even looking.
So, pushing the whole lane out one foot (and repaving!) would be the best solution.
Or... would it be possible (or desirable) to raise the lane to the sidewalk level?
Posted by: M.V. Jantzen | April 20, 2012 at 09:30 AM
You'd have to regrade that side of the street and put a valley gutter between the cycletrack and the parking. Something to be done when repaving.
Posted by: Dave | April 20, 2012 at 11:08 AM
The cycling signal at 15th & Penn is clear, if we checked drivers' visual acuity often enough...
I also think cyclists know where they're supposed to stop, but chose not to. I had a woman pass me while I was stopped at a stop bar, this morning, she did it in such a way I said "you know we're supposed to stop back here, right?" she responded that, it's a crosswalk, it's no big deal. (granted, it may not be a "big deal" but it's the law...)
Posted by: @SamuelMoore | April 20, 2012 at 11:13 AM
"it's a crosswalk, it's no big deal."
This is interesting. It suggests that, perhaps, when cyclists travel in a crosswalk they are more likely to proceed against the light than when not in a crosswalk and that the use of the pedestrian signal makes them act as though the are in a crosswalk (IIRC, the 15th street configuration has them next to the crosswalk).
My own experience is that I think of jaywalking as less of a big deal than running/Idaho-stopping a red light. I think this supports the idea of using bicycle-specific signals.
Posted by: Jonathan Krall | April 20, 2012 at 12:03 PM
Flashing turn signals on 15th? As in, replace the current red/yellow/green solid arrows with flashing ones? That seems like a move in the wrong direction. Or am I misunderstanding?
Posted by: Jon Renaut | April 20, 2012 at 12:45 PM
As I understand it, the northbound green signal on 15th would also get a flashing yellow left-turn signal. That would indicate that those turning left on the green phase (as opposed to the green-arrow phase) should cautiously turn.
Actuating the left turns would also help. I've often stopped at red lights only to see that a green arrow was directing no one to turn left.
Posted by: Westnorth | April 21, 2012 at 12:16 PM