DDOT submitted new bicycle parking regulations to the DC Council last week, moving them one step closer to implementation.
The new regulations are a response to the 2007 Bicycle Commuter and Parking Expansion Act (page 11) which created a requirement that residential building owners "provide secure bicycle parking spaces for all existing residential buildings with 8 or more units." Though the law has been on the books for 5 years, without the rules it couldn't be enforced.
The rules provide for a hardship waiver, if the owner can demonstrate to DDOT that bicycle parking “is not physically practical, that undue economic hardship would result from strict compliance with the regulation, or that the nature of the building use is such that bicycle parking spaces would not be used.”
The parking should be inside, if possible, no lower than the first cellar level or first complete parking level below ground. Bicycle rooms must have solid walls and a motion-activated security light.
If there’s no room inside, outside parking must be secure and covered. The rules also define the minimum size of bicycle lockers, the minimum dimensions of the parking space access aisles, and the minimum width of each parking space — depending on whether bicycles are parked vertically or horizontally.
Of course, if a building had a parking garage attached to it, it was already required to provide bike parking for each 20 car spaces, but this should create more parking, better parking and parking in buildings without car spaces.
And now that the rules are finished, a study should be performed on commercial buildings in the District similar to the one done on government buildings last year. And, of course, enforcement.
Don't count on enforcement by the District. If your building should have bike parking, raise a fuss with building management. Point out zoning code and LEED standards, if applicable. Suggest rack designs (better ones don't cost any more than bad ones). Try to get it installed within eyesight of the parking attendant. And make good friends with the parking attendants (a small Starbucks card at Xmas time doesn't hurt).
I've found that it may take time, but I've yet to fail in having bike parking provided where it was required.
Posted by: Crikey7 | October 01, 2012 at 12:24 PM
why the mandate for solid walls? I'd think people would generally feel safer with more visibility in what usually turns out to be a small room in a lonely corner.
Posted by: Mike | October 01, 2012 at 01:31 PM
All existing buildings -- or just new ones.
Some sort of waiver where you make a community contribution to bikeshare would be nice.
Posted by: charlie | October 01, 2012 at 01:40 PM
All existing buildings.
Posted by: washcycle | October 01, 2012 at 01:41 PM
CaBi could fall under TDM plans which many new facilities need.
Posted by: washcycle | October 01, 2012 at 01:42 PM
My buildings bike room is dingy, dirty, and a PIA to get to as it is below ground. Worse is that thieves seem to clean it out every couple of weeks.
So my bike sleeps with me. One arm protectively curled around the top tube.
Posted by: JeffB | October 01, 2012 at 03:07 PM
My garage's problem isn't theft, access or even cleanliness, it was people leaving their bikes there for too long. Eventually they put up a sign that said 15 days max. One guy had left three bikes and his bike carrier attachment chain linked to the rack for a month or so on end. And that's in a commercial building downtown. Go figure.
Posted by: T | October 01, 2012 at 04:14 PM