« What your new CaBi will probably look like (the seat goes to 11) | Main | Arlington makes plans for a more bike-friendly Rosslyn »


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

McKinley there seems like a good candidate. The hill there is steep and the road curved. In a car, it's very easy to pick up a lot of speed going down the hill, and on a bike, it's very easy for a cyclist, especially a kid going to school, to ride all wobbly. The bike lane also feeds right into the WO&D there at 66.

Nothing like getting TA funding to repave the street after construction a McKinley Elementary tears apart the street. The street is wide and has good sightlines. Whether the bike lane is buffered probably doesn't matter. I hope that the buffering involves paint only on the downhill since you wouldn't want to hit a plastic pylon at speed.

The site lines are okay, but on a residential street where people regularly push 40 on a curve going down a hill, I can see why they'd want to slow things down and separate the bike lane. It is quite true that whatever is used to separate it could become a problem for a cyclist flying down the hill.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Banner design by creativecouchdesigns.com

City Paper's Best Local Bike Blog 2009


 Subscribe in a reader