Did you know there is a presidential election tomorrow? And right here in our own America? I know that's hard to believe because it seems like we always have them and Canada never does (or is that the Stanley Cup?) but it's true.
Anyway, here are a few facts about the two major party candidates and their campaigns as they relate to bicycles and bicycling. (My apologies to those who are "Feeling the Johnson" or "Whatevering the Stein" or "Too Busy Watching Game of Thrones")
Clinton -
- In 1999, as First Lady she worked with Rails to Trails on the Millennium Trails program, which "recognized, promoted and enhanced or built more than 2,000 trails across the country, with a goal of engaging Americans in marking the new millennium and preserving a lasting legacy." It designated 16 National Millennium Trails, including the East Coast Greenway and American Discovery Trails, both of which pass through the DC area. It also named 50 Millennium Legacy Trails, of which the Metropolitan Branch Trail was one. She continued to support trails while in the Senate, most notably New York City's High Line.
- In the Senate, she was one of two co-sponsors of S.546 - A bill to encourage energy conservation through bicycling. She also cosponsored other bills that would encourage more biking for its energy conservation benefits (ex: "Clean Edge Act of 2003"), or its health benefits, (ex: the "Improved Nutrition and Physical Activity Act"); and others that included safety improvements or greater funding as part of a larger transportation bill, (ex: "The National Highway Safety Act of 2003")
- In her transportation fact sheet, under the sub-heading "Expand public transit options to lower transportation costs and unlock economic opportunity for Americans in opportunity deserts" there is this line "She will also support bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure—reducing carbon emissions, improving public health and safety, and further providing Americans with affordable transportation options."
Trump
- Sponsored a bicycle race bearing his name.
- Mocked John Kerry for biking.“John Kerry is a joke. No, he's a bicyclist,” Trump said
- Has an infrastructure plan, but it doesn't mention bikes or biking.
In general, it's more likely that a President Trump would embrace concepts like a "lockbox" for transportation funding that regards such funding as a zero sum game, in which every dollar not spent on auto-oriented transportation is a transportation dollar wasted.
Posted by: Crickey7 | November 07, 2016 at 10:50 AM
President Trump won't give a [darn] about bike infrastructure, no will anyone he hires.
Under President Clinton, we'll continue to get lip service with blah results.
Look at the Intersection of Doom - the elected representatives that are responsible for the National Park Service, the Virginia Department of Transportation, and the Arlington Transportation Division are all very much Team Clinton (some have been nearly their whole lives).
Yet, between a progressive majority on the Arlington County Board, a progressive in the Virginia Governor's mansion, and a progressive President of the United States, we still have the longstanding dumpster fire at the intersection of doom.
That short cycle no right turn arrow arguably made thing worse, as it's not at all standard, counterintuitive in operation, and barely visible in the afternoon sun for half the year.
Posted by: Kolohe | November 07, 2016 at 12:09 PM
We known which candidate wants to "Make America V8"
Posted by: SJE | November 07, 2016 at 12:50 PM
The IoD is a difficult intersection partially because of the different entities involved. It really isn't likely to be affected no matter who is elected. However, that doesn't mean that one candidate isn't going to be better for cycling than another. Funding for cycling infrastructure often goes in hand with transit funding (transit-oriented development), and if there are conservative majorities in congress and a Trump president, there isn't going to be much in the way of federal transit funding.
Add in that Trump and the Republicans would like to eliminate the EPA and replace it with a nonbinding congressional committee--so that we can't breath the damn air when trying to ride--and it's no contest.
Posted by: DE | November 07, 2016 at 01:23 PM
I'm voting in full spandex tomorrow. And who said democracy ain't pretty?
Posted by: Crickey7 | November 07, 2016 at 06:11 PM
They're both terrible. But Trump mocks bikes. Homie don't play that.
Posted by: barry vance | November 08, 2016 at 08:18 AM
I rolled into my polling place pre-6 a.m. and locked the bike up outside. Once done, I noted a woman with a cargo bike bringing the bike into the school cafeteria. Perfectly good racks outside, but you gotta do what you gotta do.
Posted by: DE | November 08, 2016 at 08:46 AM
Same experience here, except it was my neighbor who said he forgot his lock.
Posted by: Crickey7 | November 08, 2016 at 02:11 PM
So what does this mean for the biking community seeing that Trump is actually winning the Elections?
Posted by: Lucy | November 09, 2016 at 02:31 AM
Federal highways funds, as I said, are more likely to be restricted in use, as in they may not be used for bike infra. Local governments will be the sole driving force, so make your voice heard locally.
Posted by: Crickey7 | November 09, 2016 at 09:16 AM