There's a paper from 2013 that I once had access to, but now do not about Adrian Fenty, biking and politics. Here's the abstract:
Promoting cycling and building bike lanes would seem to be an uncontroversial way for progressive mayors to build up their ‘green’ and ‘smart city’ reputations. After all, cycling promotes health, reduces traffic and fights global warming. Yet, surprisingly, it was former Washington DC Mayor Adrian Fenty’s enthusiasm for building bike lanes that, at least in part, brought his once-promising political career to a sudden end in 2010. Drawing on a synthesis of Bourdieu’s field theory and Stuart Hall’s concept of articulation, this article offers a case study of cycling and class politics in Washington DC. In particular, this article examines how, during the 2010 Mayoral election, cycling became articulated with wider struggles over gentrification and race. A concluding section draws on the case to argue that Hall’s concept of articulation offers a useful corrective for the subtle bias toward social reproduction in Bourdieu’s theory of social fields.
It sounds fascinating. If anyone has access and wants to tell us about it in the comments, I'm all ears.
Fascinating yes, but what does it tell us of dog parks?
Try contacting the author of the paper directly and request a copy.
Posted by: Jeffb | September 25, 2018 at 08:03 AM
I requested access a couple of times with no luck. I might need to go to the library to read it.
Posted by: washcycle | September 25, 2018 at 10:23 AM
I used this article to write a paper for grad school! I'll take a look on my laptop to see if I still have it when I get home.
Posted by: dcdutchiedude | September 25, 2018 at 12:53 PM
I've gotten a copy of the paper, so no worries.
Posted by: washcycle | September 25, 2018 at 01:47 PM
Reading it now. It does mention dog parks.
Posted by: washcycle | September 25, 2018 at 03:05 PM